![]() |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
We
have reached a new milestone in our quest to understand
ourselves. On
February 15, 2001, the International Human Genome
Sequencing Consortium published a landmark report:
“Initial sequencing and analysis of the human
genome” (Nature, Vol. 409). As I
thumb through the maps of human chromosomes presented in
the report, I am both amazed and humbled by the
accomplishment. The
international collaboration of specialists in computing,
mathematics, molecular genetics, technology, and other
sciences to accomplish this task and usher us into the
modern era of biotechnology has been extraordinary.
At the same time, the potential consequences of
using the resulting information and skills are humbling.
“We’ve now got to the point in human history
where for the first time we are going to hold in our
hands the set of instructions to make a human being.”
John Sulston, UK Sanger Centre
(For more reactions, see: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_807000/807126.stm).
Decoding
the human genome brings new meaning to “the
information age.”
In a few short years we have progressed beyond
creating digital books and encircling the globe with the
World Wide Web to documenting the full text of the
genetic code that describes how to assemble and operate
a human being. We
may not yet know how to interpret all the text, let
alone follow the recipe, but it is being recorded in
full detail on the Web for anyone in the world to see.
From the perspective of digital information, this
is the book of human life, and decoding it is a
phenomenal accomplishment of scientific thinking and our
creative use of technology.
The only thing more astounding is that this
genetic recipe has been stored, read, and translated by
every nucleated cell in every human that has ever lived. But
what are we to make of it?
Presented here are some initial ideas about what
high school students and informed parents can learn
about the human genome.
First, a few words about the source of recent
findings. On
October 1, 1990, a project—the Human Genome Project (HGP)—aimed
at mapping and sequencing the entire genetic code of
humans began. Funding
of the project in the United States has been provided by
the National Institutes of Health and the U.S.
Department of Energy, with the goal of sequencing the
entire human genome within 15 years.
Due to advances in technology and vigorous
competition, the project is currently well ahead of
schedule and costing less than anticipated.
A guide to the project and its accomplishments to
date has been edited by Dennis and Gallagher (2001), and
the rich context of events and issues leading up the
project have been provided by Bishop and Waldholz
(1999). A
response to the ramifications—from interpreting the
past to considering the future—of the HGP has been
contributed by Ridley (1999).
These and other authors characterize the
accomplishments of the HGP as more than a momentous
achievement; rather, the sequencing of the human genome
is viewed as the beginning of a revolution in knowledge. The Emerging Legacy of the HGP As
spectacular as the accomplishments of the HGP have been,
its ongoing importance will be revealed through what it
enables us to do over time.
The information gathered from the Project will
fuel biological and medical research for years to come,
transforming both science and how we use genetic
information. Transforming
How Science is Done The
HGP has introduced fundamental changes in the way
biological research is done (Butler, 2001).
In addition to the advent of large-scale,
international, multidisciplinary collaboration in
pursuing an ambitious goal, we’ve seen the further
transformation of biology into a computational science
with huge data sets to mine.
The online publishing of results through the
World Wide Web is also notable and will likely further
the trend toward nearly real time dissemination of
research findings.
Science educators will need to revise their
descriptions of scientific enterprise to reflect these
new ways of gathering, interpreting, and disseminating
information. Developing
New Tools to Combat Disease Information
and techniques associated with the HGP are leading to
new approaches to examining and understanding the causes
and mechanisms of diseases.
A review issue of Pathology [Vol.195 (1)] was devoted to “Genomic Pathology—A New
Frontier” Also,
a publication by the Department of Energy,
Genomics and Its Impact on Medicine and Society:
A 2001 Primer (Available
online at http://www.ornl.gov/hgmis/publicat/primer2001/index.html),
outlines potential applications of genome
research to medicine and disease control, including the
following: •
Improving diagnoses of diseases •
Detecting genetic predispositions to disease
•
Creating drugs based on molecular information •
Using gene therapy and control systems as drugs •
Designing “custom drugs” based on individual
genetic profiles Examining
the Human Condition The
ability to perform detailed analyses of DNA sequences
enables both genetically describing individuals and
discerning the genetic heritage of individuals and
groups over time. Some
of the applications of these procedures are outlined by Genomics and Its Impact on Medicine and Society, including he
following: •
Risk
Assessment Evaluating
the health risks faced by individuals who may be exposed
to radiation (including low levels in industrial areas)
and to cancer-causing chemicals and toxins. •
Bioarchaeology,
Anthropology, Evolution, and Human Migration Studying
evolution through germline mutations in lineages Studying migrations of
different population groups based on maternal genetic
inheritance Studying mutations on
the Y chromosome to trace lineage and migration of males
Comparing breakpoints
in the evolution of mutations with ages of populations
and historical events
•
DNA
Identification Identifying
potential suspects whose DNA may match evidence left at
crime scenes Exonerating persons
wrongly accused of crimes Identifying crime,
catastrophe, and other victims Establishing paternity
and other family relationships Matching organ donors
with recipients in transplant programs
Despite
the rapid progress and success of the HGP, little
attention has been given to the project and its findings
within the standard school curriculum.
Some have focused on the ethical dimensions
(Morris, 1994; Rifkin, 1998), and others have focused on
the challenge of teaching about DNA sequencing (Morvillo,
1997). As McInerney (1996) has pointed out, there has been no
educational revolution in response to the biological
revolution regarding our understanding of human genetics
and the human genome. Given the inevitable role that genetics will
increasingly have as a central feature of health care
and public policy, it is crucially important that
non-specialists come to understand genetics and its many
applications. McInerney
identified four challenges in translating the
complexities of modern genetics to non-specialists: •
Teaching
for conceptual understanding.
Conventional instruction in genetics typically is
preoccupied with isolated facts, extensive vocabularies,
simplistic single-gene traits, and typologies rather
than variation. •
The nature
of science. As
Mcinerney said, “Poor public understanding of how the
scientific community generates and validates new
knowledge likely is a more critical deficiency than is
the public’s lack of familiarity with any given piece
of that knowledge.” The best way to learn about the nature of science is to
actually do science in the classroom, and there are many
genome-related investigations appropriate for the high
school classroom. •
The
personal and social impact of science and technology.
The pace at which advances in our understanding
of genetics is raising once-hypothetical issues calls
for greater attention to ethics and public policy
matters in the science classroom.
We must move beyond simplistic debates to engage
students in critical analysis of arguments, reasoning,
and views. •
The
principles of technology.
Technology-dependent endeavors such as the HGP
and genetic medicine highlight the need to promote
greater attention to the principles of technology in
science classes. The resources identified in Part 2 of this Digest are provided to assist educators in meeting these challenges. An indication of the potential linkages between the HGP and the National Science Education Standards is included, along with Web resources and instructional materials that can serve as starting places in developing school instruction and public outreach programs. References Bishop, J. E., &
Waldholz, M. (1999).
Genome:
The story of the most astonishing scientific
adventure of our time—The attempt to map all the genes
in the human body (Updated Edition). San
Jose, CA: toExcel. Butler, D.
(2001). Postgenomics: Data, data, everywhere... Nature,
414, 840 - 841 Dennis, C., &
Gallagher, R. (2001).
The human genome. New
York: Palgrave. McInerney, J. D.
(1996). The Human Genome Project and biology education.
The
Australian Science Teachers Journal, 42
(1), 11-17. Morris, L. J.
(1994). Bioethical dilemmas:
Decision-making and the Human Genome Project.
The Science Teacher, 61
(2), 38-41. Morvillo, N.
(1997). The dynamics of DNA sequencing.
The Science Teacher, 64
(7), 46-50. National Research Council.
(1996). National
Science Education Standards.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
(Available online at: http://books.nap.edu/html/nses/html/index.html. Ridley M.
(1999). Genome: The autobiography of a species in 23 chapters.
New York: HarperCollins. Rifkin, J.
(1998). The sociology of the gene: Genetics and education on the eve
of the biotech century.
Phi Delta
Kappan, 79 (9), 648-54.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
Return to Digest Directory | Top | Educational REAMLS Home |
|||||||||||||